Change the Hosts of the 2026 World Cup

"For Sweden" (rallybeetle)
07/02/2018 at 11:50 • Filed to: CONCAFAF, MExico, Soccer, Football, World Cup

The USA, Canada, nor Mexico could advance to the quarterfinals of this year’s World Cup, yet FIFA expects these football minnows to host the 2026 world cup. It’s a disgrace. Only nations that care about football should host World Cups.

DISCUSSION (23)

Sir Halffast > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 11:56

You mean, like the powerhouse nation of Qatar?

Spanfeller is a twat > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 11:57

I hate the fact that we’re gonna host it because I hate football fanatics , but probably have the best infrastructure to host it tho.

For Sweden > Sir Halffast
07/02/2018 at 11:58

Qatar is another bad-at-football petro state that doesn’t deserve a World Cup

promoted by the color red > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 11:59

me reading this

Svend > Sir Halffast
07/02/2018 at 12:00

The Arab nations are really passionate about football with even the most minor games televised.

Some may not be great at it, but the love it all the same.

Party-vi > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 12:04

O K BUT HOW COULD ANYONE ELSE CARE MORE ABOUT FOOTBALL THAN US????? WE LITERALLY HAVE THE BIGGEST FOOTBALL GAME IN THE WORLD EVERY YEAR THAT’S RIGHT THE SUPERBOWL.

Sir Halffast > Svend
07/02/2018 at 12:04

Passionate about football? Yes.

Good at football? Hell no.

Good at bribery and slavery? Oh absolutely yes.

Sir Halffast > Spanfeller is a twat
07/02/2018 at 12:05

And the stadiums already exist without the need to kill thousands of migrant workers. Imagine that.

Manny05x > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 12:17

This sounds dumb as hell, you realized the united states alone has huge futbol fans (not americans). I have not met a Mexican that does not like futbol.

Azrek > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 12:32

FIFA is known to make sound judgements when it comes to making money! In this case...3 countries worth of money

Spanfeller is a twat > Manny05x
07/02/2018 at 12:53

Hello, my name is Francisco, pleased to meet you!

Spanfeller is a twat > Azrek
07/02/2018 at 12:55

I wonder how much money Delta-AeroMexico, Interjet,Volaris, Air Canada, Westjet, Southwest, and United are going to make under the guise of “sharing" the world cup.

Gerry197 > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 12:55

You realize it’s still a business right?

Maybe it will get n ations with large populations interested in the game?

Tapping into the American market would benefit them, hosting the event could help do that.

RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > Party-vi
07/02/2018 at 12:57

I’m pretty sure some kickyball kids could use one of the big fields somewhere if they asked nicely.

Azrek > Spanfeller is a twat
07/02/2018 at 12:58

Them < FIFA

X < X + FIFA

Proper math!

Manny05x > Spanfeller is a twat
07/02/2018 at 12:59

Hahaha. Viva el tri!!!

For Sweden > Party-vi
07/02/2018 at 13:44

If a bird can win it it’s not a real game

For Sweden > Manny05x
07/02/2018 at 13:44

If Mexico was worthy they would advance to the quarterfinals

boredalways > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 13:45

We are really good at Football so suck it!

Kinja'd!!!

Party-vi > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 13:46

Unless it’s mountain climbing, auto racing, or bull fighting, they’re all merely games

gogmorgo - rowing gears in a Grand Cherokee > For Sweden
07/02/2018 at 14:13

H osting world cups in places where world cups are not as popular is good for business. It will generate more buzz in popularity in that locality, which will create new fans, which will generate greater revenue for the organizing agency.

It also reduces negative press generated by the chaos that descends upon communities where it is popular, when local fans conflict with the incoming crush of non-local fans.

merged-5876237249235911857-hrw8uc > Party-vi
07/02/2018 at 14:16

Yes! Came here to say the same thing, we love our football... but I think he’s talking about soccer... we don’t give a flying fuck about soccer.

Manny05x > For Sweden
07/05/2018 at 09:55

They did pretty good.